Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karis Anne's avatar

Amen! This was an excellent article! I would say that I also tend to desire to take an extreme position because of my conviction about being a "convicted Christian." But sometimes strict Christian dogmatism on second and third tier issues (such as music, movies, Calvinism v. Arminianism etc.) can lead to legalism and extreme narrow mindedness.

I have heard it said before that Christianity "can seem easier" when we take dogmatic positions on gray-to-a-certain-extent issues (of course, arguing that it is the "best" or "only right" way) but Christianity is not MEANT to be "easy" like that.

God did not give us a handbook on where to go to college, what movie to watch, or what music to listen to. God gave us the Bible, which we are supposed to discern and apply to every area of our lives. Part of the sanctification process is seeking wisdom and making decisions God's way...by searching the Scriptures for yourself.

This sanctification process does NOT involve arguing that God has spoken from the clouds and told you everything you need to believe, take a stand on, or do and that everybody else is in fact WRONG.

That is not God's way. God is not the maker of robots...and he surely can not expect humans He has created with a free will to have all the same convictions. Couldn't Christians having different convictions about conscience issues (such as movies and music) to a certain extent be part of God's plan for us and our individual growth from the beginning?

I really liked your thought in the article that extreme, dogmatic ideas on certain not-essential-to-Christianity issues are not only unreasonable, but also "fearfully faithless."

Note: I WOULD probably argue that all Calvinists (that actively CALL themselves Calvinists) DO believe that Christ only died for the elect...although not necessarily all people that consider themselves "reformed."

Actually one of the foundational pillars of Calvinism is the whole concept of limited atonement.

Now, taking the idea of limited atonement to the extreme - "Christ only died for the elect, so therefore I don't need to witness" - is an idea that most God-seeking-Bible-believing Calvinists actually don't hold (contrary to the "extremist stereotype" that some veins of evangelical Christianity like to label Calvinists with).

I just say this to clarify (because many in my church including my pastor consider themselves five-point Calvinists although I do not), but you are welcome to disagree :)

Expand full comment
Joan Spilman's avatar

I would that you would write an article on how the "heath and wealth" prosperity gospel has distorted the faith of many. That's extreme greed cloaked in Scripture taken totally out of context.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts